Regarding the normative definition of the concept and essence of justice

This article is aimed at the need for normative definition of concept and essence justice as a particularly important term in sphere realization judicial power, system activity courts. It emphasized that despite fact widely used scientific works legislation, Constitution Ukraine eighth chapter called “Justice”, its are not normatively defined, scholars interpretations Constitutional Court understand it differently, which creates certain problems. Although has separate section on justice, so called, but there no this here (as none other acts), if you analyze content, becomes obvious contains many things identical with from these constitutional provisions difficult to unclear why legislator Chapter Eight “Justice” included relating proceedings, system, organization judiciary, legal status judges entities, because although all closely linked itself. Since basic basis domestic law such uncertainty inconsistency regarding causes corresponding consequences adoption various regulations, well research area. Both legislation definitions considered type or branch state activity, function on. We consider wrong sphere, what we use above cases defined by law, when comes then would be correct talk about implementation judiciary. Justice can confirmed paragraph 1 3 Resolution Ukraine. Having studied analyzed opinions authors, interpretation Resolution, “justice” acts, note different understandings legislators, identification terms, unacceptable unnecessary terminological confusion, difficulties theory enforcement, offer our own point enshrinement amending chapter, also proposed change very title more appropriate one (“Organization Judiciary” “Judicial System, Proceedings”) correspond content contained section.